The Potential Influence of To-Be-Forgotten Information on Educational Judgments
Teachers often face complex educational judgments and research has shown that teachers are prone to be influenced by unrelated information in their ju.
- Pub. date: June 15, 2021
- Pages: 13-24
- 331 Downloads
- 567 Views
- 0 Citations
Teachers often face complex educational judgments and research has shown that teachers are prone to be influenced by unrelated information in their judgments and decisions. To investigate the influence of potential misinformation we employed a list-method directed forgetting paradigm and investigated a simulated judgment scenario, in which participants were asked to recommend a higher or lower school track for a fictitious elementary school child. Previous research using list-method directed forgetting revealed that participants can intentionally forget information but this information might still influence further judgments. In two experiments, data on recall performance, school track recommendation, and the evaluative impression of the target were analyzed to investigate whether participants were able to intentionally forget information and whether the to-be-forgotten information influenced later judgments. To-be-forgotten information was either presented before (Experiment 1) or following (Experiment 2) information instructed to be remembered. Both experiments revealed that participants did not forget information instructed to be forgotten and their judgments were not influenced by this information. Bayes factors spoke in favor of the null hypotheses, indicating that the influence of to-be-forgotten information on simulated school track recommendations is questionable. Our results revealed important boundary conditions of directed forgetting in applied contexts.
Keywords: Directed forgetting, educational judgments, judgment bias, school track recommendation.
0
References
Abel, M., & Bäuml, K.‑H. T. (2019). List-method directed forgetting after prolonged retention interval: Further challenges to contemporary accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.002
Anderson, M. C. (2005). The role of inhibitory control in forgetting unwanted memories: A consideration of three methods. In N. Ohta, C. M. MacLeod & B. Uttl (Eds.), Dynamic Cognitive Processes (pp. 159–189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-27431-6_8
Anderson, M. C., & Hanslmayr, S. (2014). Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.002
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Gargano, G. J. (1993). Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.603
Bishop, A. J. (1976). Decision-making, the intervening variable. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(1/2), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144357
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(1-2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1996.0011
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2003). Intentional forgetting can increase, not decrease, residual influences of to-be-forgotten information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.524
Bjork, R. A. (1970). Positive forgetting: The noninterference of items intentionally forgotten. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80059-7
Burns, M. D., Monteith, M. J., & Parker, L. R. (2017). Training away bias: The differential effects of counterstereotype training and self-regulation on stereotype activation and application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.003
Carlana, M. (2019). Implicit stereotypes: Evidence from teachers’ gender bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1163–1224. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz008
Delaney, P. F., Nghiem, K. N., & Waldum, E. R. (2009). The selective directed forgetting effect: Can people forget only part of a text? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1542–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902770049
Dünnebier, K., Gräsel, C., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2009). Urteilsverzerrungen in der schulischen Leistungsbeurteilung: Eine experimentelle Studie zu Ankereffekten [Biases in teacher's assessments of student performance: An experimental study of anchoring effects]. German Journal of Educational Psychology/ Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(34), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.187
Englich, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(7), 1535–1551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02687.x
Geiselman, R. E., Bjork, R. A., & Fishman, D. L. (1983). Disrupted retrieval in directed forgetting: A link with posthypnotic amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.58
Golding, J. M., & Hauselt, J. (1994). When instructions to forget become instructions to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294202005
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1420–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1998). Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(6), 1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1483
Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001
Kaya, A. (2014). Decision making by coaches and athletes in sport. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.205
La Neal, V. I., McCray, A. D., Webb-Johnson, G., & Bridgest, S. T. (2003). The effects of African American movement styles on teachers' perceptions and reactions. The Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370010501
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
McCombs, R. C., & Gay, J. (1988). Effects of race, class, and IQ information on judgments of parochial grade school teachers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(5), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9922918
Parks, F. R., & Kennedy, J. H. (2007). The Impact of race, physical attractiveness, and gender on education majors' and teachers' perceptions of student competence. Journal of Black Studies, 37(6), 936–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934705285955
Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K.‑H. T. (2010). Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017406
Questback GmbH. (2017). EFS Survey [Computer software]. https://www.unipark.de/
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
Sahakyan, L., Delaney, P. F., Foster, N. L., & Abushanab, B. (2013). List-method directed forgetting in cognitive and clinical research. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 131–189). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407187-2.00004-6
Sahakyan, L., & Kelley, C. M. (2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1064
Schneider, T. (2011). Die Bedeutung der sozialen Herkunft und des Migrationshintergrundes für Lehrerurteile am Beispiel der Grundschulempfehlung [The importance of social and migrant backgrounds for school recommendations in Germany at the end of primary school]. German Journal for Educational Science/ Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-011-0221-4
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.58
Stubbe, T. C., & Bos, W. (2008). Schullaufbahnempfehlungen von Lehrkräften und Schullaufbahnentscheidungen von Eltern am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe [Teacher's school track recommendations and parents' school track decisions at the end of primary school]. Empircal Pedagogy/ Empirische Pädagogik, 22(1), 49–63.
Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers' gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020518104346
van Ophuysen, S. (2006). Vergleich diagnostischer Entscheidungen von Novizen und Experten am Beispiel der Schullaufbahnempfehlung [Comparison of diagnostic decisions between novices and experts: The example of school career recommendation]. German Journal for Developmental Psychology and Educational Psychology/ Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(4), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.38.4.154
Wyer, N. A. (2010). You never get a second chance to make a first (implicit) impression: The role of elaboration in the formation and revision of implicit impressions. Social Cognition, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.1
Wyer, R. S., & Unverzagt, W. H. (1985). Effects of instructions to disregard information on its subsequent recall and use in making judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.533